Posts from December 2015.

In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On December 22, 2015 the CPSC issued the following recall notices related to products that present fire hazards:

Carrier Recalls Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps, Including Previously Recalled Units, Due to Fire Hazard.Continue Reading

By: Edward Jaeger and Michael Wolfer

In Gongloff Contracting, L.L.C. v. L. Robert Kimball & Associates, Architects and Engineers, 119 A.3d 1070 (Pa. Super. 2015), the Pennsylvania Superior Court recently held that a negligent misrepresentation claim against an architect does not require a plaintiff to make allegations of an express misrepresentation by the architect in order to survive a motion for judgment on the pleadings based on the economic loss doctrine. The court held that, pursuant to Bilt-Rite Contractors, Inc. v. The Architectural Studio, 581 Pa. 454 (2005), a plaintiff may sufficiently plead a negligent misrepresentation claim by asserting that the architect’s design documents contained false information.Continue Reading

In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On December 8, 2015, the CPSC issued the following recall notices related to products that present fire hazards:

Limoss Recalls Battery Power Packs for Power Recliners and Lift Chairs Due to Fire HazardContinue Reading

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Calendar Event Calendar

Subscribe

Jump to Page

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.