In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall announced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On May 9, 2024, the CPSC announced the following recall related to a product that presents a fire hazard:
According to the CPSC’s website, “[t]he fuel tank cap ... Continue Reading
In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a warning about the product at issue may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On April 4, 2024, the CPSC issued a warning urging consumers to “immediately stop using True Brothers refillable fuel bottles sold by Shenzhen Yinglong Industrial.” According the CPSC, bottles “pose a risk of poisoning and burns to children due to lack of a child resistant ... Continue Reading
In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a warning about the product at issue may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On April 4, 2024, the CPSC issued a warning urging consumers “to immediately stop using refillable fuel bottles sold by Shenzhen Pink Vine Technology.” The fuel bottles were sold Walmart.com. According the CPSC, the bottles “pose a risk of poisoning and burns to children due to ... Continue Reading
In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a warning about the product at issue may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On March 28, 2024, the CPSC issued a warning urging consumers to “immediately stop using Elide Fire Extinguishing Balls due to failure to extinguish fires and risk of serious injury or death.” According the CPSC, “the products can fail to effectively disperse fire retardant ... Continue Reading
In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a warning about the product at issue may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On March 14, 2024, the CPSC issued a warning urging consumers to “immediately stop using the extension cords, and destroy them by unplugging, cutting the cord, and safely disposing in the garbage.” According the CPSC, Faddare 16.4’ extension power Cords “have undersized ... Continue Reading
In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a warning about the product at issue may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On March 7, 2024, the CPSC issued a warning urging consumers to “Immediately Stop Using EVERCROSS EV5 Hoverboards Due to Fire Hazard; Sold on Amazon.com and Walmart.com.” According the CPSC, it “has received one report of a fire, resulting in substantial property damage to a ... Continue Reading
Recent Posts
Categories
- Products Liability
- CPSC Recalls
- Subrogation
- Podcast
- CPSC Warning
- Uncategorized
- Water Loss
- Pennsylvania
- Negligence
- Texas
- Assignment
- Missouri
- Parties
- Public Policy
- Civil Procedure
- New York
- New Jersey
- Res Judicata
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Cargo - Transportation
- Damages
- Damages – Personal Property
- Landlord-Tenant
- Sutton Doctrine
- Evidence
Tags
- Product Liability
- Products Liability
- Subrogation
- Texas
- Louisiana
- Podcast
- Subro Sessions
- Certificate of Merit
- Expert Qualifications
- Experts
- Amazon
- Civil Procedure
- Evidence
- CPSC Recalls; Products Liability
- Waiver of Subrogation
- Construction Defects
- Amazon-eBay
- Contracts
- Evidence - Hearsay
- Loss of Use
- Vehicles
- Landlord-Tenant
- Sutton Doctrine
- Negligent Undertaking
- workers' compensation subrogation
- Arizona
- Warranty - Implied
- Construction Contracts
- Maryland
- Made Whole
- Georgia
- Statute of Repose
- Illinois
- Malfunction Theory; Design Defect
- West Virginia
- Pennsylvania
- Independent Duty
- Limitation of Liability
- Negligence
- Ohio
- Statute of Limitations - Contractual
- Water Damage
- Connecticut
- Contracts - Enforcement
- Public Policy
- Unconscionable
- Missouri
- Parties
- Design Defect
- Failure to Warn
- Manufacturing Defect
- New York
- Pleading
- Removal
- Entire Controversy Doctrine
- Motion to Intervene
- New Jersey
- Res Judicata
- Subrogation; High-Net-Worth; Damages; Art; Cargo-Transportation; Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Products Liability – Risk-Utility