
Will COVID-19 impact subrogation? Like so much else, the answer is “yes.”
The global effect of COVID-19 is unlike any event in human history. More than 4 billion people—over half of the world's population—are currently under confinement measures. In just a few short weeks, COVID-19 has impacted nearly every aspect of life across the globe. In the United States, stay-at-home orders started in mid-March. We can only speculate how long this will be the new norm. On March 29th, President Trump suggested the spread of the coronavirus will not peak for at least another two weeks and he extended the national social distancing guidelines through April 30th.
There is little doubt stay-at-home orders will remain in effect into May and some predictions have the lockdown lasting well into the summer. Whatever the timeframe, the ripple effects will last even longer. The impacts will be far-reaching and there will be effects on losses, subrogation claims, and litigation. It is foreseeable that there will be influences on the nature, frequency, and extent of property losses.
Larger Commercial Water Losses
At the time of this writing, 39 states (and counting), Washington DC and Puerto Rico have active executive orders closing non-essential businesses and instructing their residents to stay at home. More than 300 million Americans, which is over 90% of the country, currently live under a stay-at-home order. With millions of businesses closed, commercial properties are sitting vacant.
A water loss that lasts for just an hour can easily result in damages in the six figures. Water losses occurring at commercial properties over the weekend, when no one is there to detect it, often result in hundreds of thousands—if not millions—of dollars in damages by the time the loss is discovered 48 hours later on Monday morning. The risk of loss presented by vacant properties where no one is there to discover losses is so great that insurance policies generally contain a Vacancy Exclusion, which precludes coverage for losses at properties that are unoccupied for a certain number of consecutive days.
Water losses occurring at vacant commercial properties in the coming weeks will, on average, be larger than they would have been had they occurred at any other time. Commercial properties that are not normally vacant for more than a weekend may now go weeks without anyone entering the building. And on the rare occasion when someone enters the building, it is only to quickly grab an item or pick up the mail. Normally small water losses that go undetected during closures will become big losses; normally big losses will become even bigger. A water loss that lasts even an extra hour can spell magnitudes more in damages. Multiply that by hours or days, and the damages could increase exponentially.
Longer Time Element Damages
Executive orders nationwide have shutdown contractors. COVID-19 closures will cause substantial delays in property repairs and, in turn, increase time element losses. Delays in repairing properties for an extra two months or more means extended periods during which insureds cannot live in their homes and insured businesses must remain closed. These repair delays will increase Additional Living Expenses (ALE) and Business Interruption losses. Additionally, the inability to place insureds in closed hotels may further drive up ALE damages.
Even after closure restrictions are lifted and repairs can commence, contractors will face backlogs that will delay repairs further still. A two month closure due to the coronavirus could lead to property repair delays of many more months.
Effects on Manufacturing and Product Liability Claims
The People’s Republic of China has been the world’s factory. The United States, in particular, imported over $500 billion in goods from China in 2018. In America, a substantial percentage of products (or their component parts) that cause water and fire losses—appliances, plumbing fixtures and components, and electronics—come from China. COVID-19 brought Chinese factories and supply chains to a screeching halt. Lockdowns in China are starting to lift but the disruption on Chinese manufacturing continues and will continue for some time to come.
In addition to the shorter-term consequences to Chinese manufacturing, the coronavirus may have farther reaching and longer lasting effects on global manufacturing. Some predict that COVID-19 will cause manufacturing to move away from China and into other countries. For example, in the recent article Coronavirus Could Be The End Of China As A Global Manufacturing Hub, Forbes predicted that “[t]he new coronavirus Covid-19 will end up being the final curtain on China’s nearly 30 year role as the world’s leading manufacturer.”
This movement away from China was already occurring, albeit slowly, as Chinese manufacturing costs steadily rose due to climbing wages and increased regulations. Then, in 2019, the shift picked up momentum when President Trump announced tariffs of up to 25% on over $300 billion of Chinese imports. More companies began exploring manufacturing opportunities outside of China, including in Vietnam, India and Mexico. It is possible—if not probable—that the coronavirus pandemic will accelerate this trend.
For months to come, closures, labor shortages, financial issues and other uncertainties will disrupt Chinese manufacturing. After that, we could see manufacturers relocate from China to other countries in Asia and elsewhere at even faster rates. These disruptions and changes to the manufacturing of so many products will breed quality control issues and, in turn, lead to an increase in the number of product failures.
Effects on the Construction Industry and Construction Claims
Construction is similar to manufacturing in that disruptions to the construction process bring about risks of failures. COVID-19 brought construction to a standstill. Many cities and states issued orders giving contractors days to bring construction projects to an abrupt stop. Those sites are now sitting in whatever conditions contractors placed them into before they were forced to suspend the project. If issues were not properly addressed, the project is vulnerable to experiencing losses.
When projects finally resume, will contractors seamlessly pick up where they left off or will steps be missed? Furthermore, contractors will be substantially behind schedule; and, because so many construction materials come from China—from steel to plumbing components and fixtures, contractors may confront additional delays on account of supply chain disruptions.
Large construction projects almost always make time of the essence in the contract and establish a time for completion. While contractors may try to enforce force majeure provisions, contending that COVID-19 was an event outside their control and necessitates extensions, contractors will still look to finish projects as quickly as possible. This, too, can be problematic because it may result in contractors taking shortcuts that can lead to losses.
Like with product manufacturing, disruptions in the construction process cause quality control issues and mistakes. Incomplete projects sitting idle, substantial delays in work, financial issues and contractual time pressures for completing projects will have significant consequences on construction and these effects may result in losses.
Increases in Carelessly Caused Residential Fires
We don’t realize how much of our time is spent outside of our home until we are forced to stay inside it 24/7. With people in their homes all day, every day, activities at home are on the rise—including those activities that cause fires, such as cooking and smoking. In the aggregate, therefore, we might see an uptick in these types of fire losses at residential properties.
Effects on Courts and Claims Departments
Once courts reopen, judges will face months of backlogged motions, conferences and trials. In addition to the backlogged dockets, judges will face an influx of filings that were tabled while the court was closed. Some courts plan to also put a moratorium on trials because the jurors would need to convene in close quarters. In Maryland, for example, trials are being postponed until September. Litigation across the country will be delayed substantially.
These delays may make early mediation more beneficial than ever. Subrogation claims, with fixed property damages, expert-driven issues and sophisticated insurers on both sides, are especially ripe for early mediation. Counsel should explore opportunities to mediate subrogation cases early—both pre-suit and post-paper discovery. Doing so will help claims departments economically move claims that will otherwise stagnate due to COVID-19-related burdens on the judicial system.
These are just some of the many ways COVID-19 may affect property losses, insurers, and subrogation claims. Moving forward, insurers should work closely with their subrogation professionals, outside counsel and experts to develop effective ways to identify cases having recovery potential. Although property insurers are facing an influx of first-party business interruption claims associated with COVID-19 and, consequently, may shift some resources to adjust these claims, it is important that insurers remain focused on recovering their losses. If insurers delay reviewing cases for subrogation potential, valuable information related to the cause of a loss may be lost, resulting in decreases in the insurer’s subrogation recoveries. Thus, insurers should promptly involve subrogation counsel to assist in identifying and prosecuting property losses that have recovery potential.
As we continue to monitor the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), White and Williams lawyers are working collaboratively to stay current on developments and counsel clients through the various legal and business issues that may arise across a variety of sectors. Read all of the updates here.
Recent Posts
Categories
- Products Liability
- CPSC Recalls
- Construction Defects
- Statute of Limitations-Repose
- Minnesota
- California
- Experts – Daubert
- Maryland
- Jurisdiction
- CPSC Warning
- Rhode Island
- Experts - Reliability
- Podcast
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Workers' Compensation
- Uncategorized
- Negligence
- New York
- Contracts
- Cargo - Transportation
- Landlord-Tenant
- Sutton Doctrine
- Waiver of Subrogation
- Arbitration
- Texas
- Pennsylvania
- AIA Contracts
- Evidence
- Florida
- Economic Loss Rule
- Malpractice
- Wyoming
- Spoliation
- Tennessee
- Water Loss
- Indiana
- Michigan
- Comparative-Contributory Negligence
- Contribution-Apportionment
- Assignment
- Missouri
- Parties
- Public Policy
- Civil Procedure
- New Jersey
- Res Judicata
- Arkansas
- Damages
- Damages – Personal Property
- Product Liability
- Arizona
- Certificate of Merit
- Litigation
- West Virginia
- Oklahoma
- Builder's Risk
- Contractual Subrogation
- Equitable Subrogation
- Georgia
- Illinois
- Insurable Interest
- Limitation of Liability
- Mississippi
- Made Whole
- Delaware
- Settlement
- Subrogation – Equitable
- Construction
- Premises Liability
- Joint or Several Liability
- Montana
- Duty
- Privity
- New Mexico
- Right to Repair Act
- Massachusetts
- Landlord
- Tenant
- Building Code
- Causation
- Architects-Engineers
Tags
- Subrogation
- Products Liability
- Construction Defects
- Product Liability
- Podcast
- Minnesota
- California
- Subro Sessions
- Experts
- Jurisdiction
- Maryland
- Texas
- Statute of Repose
- Jurisdiction - Personal
- Statute of Limitations - Accrual
- Experts – Daubert
- Waiver of Subrogation
- Rhode Island
- CPSC Recalls; Products Liability
- Contracts
- Negligence
- Civil Procedure
- Landlord-Tenant
- Experts - Reliability
- Pennsylvania
- Georgia
- Certificate of Merit
- Louisiana
- Amazon-eBay
- Made Whole
- Economic Loss Doctrine
- New York
- Florida
- Construction Contracts
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Illinois
- Experts – Qualifications
- New Jersey
- Parties
- Ohio
- Right to Repair Act
- Statute of Limitations - Tolling
- Contracts - Enforcement
- Arizona
- Sutton Doctrine
- West Virginia
- Indiana
- Design Defect
- Spoliation
- Water Damage
- Evidence
- Evidence - Hearsay
- Connecticut
- Damages
- Privity
- Condominiums
- Massachusetts
- Tennessee
- Statute of Limitations
- workers' compensation subrogation
- Limitation of Liability
- Apportionment
- Expert Qualifications
- Exculpatory Clause
- Amazon
- Arbitration
- Negligence – Duty
- Wisconsin
- Workers’ Compensation
- Public Policy
- Missouri
- Negligent Undertaking
- Statute of Limitations - Contractual
- Delaware
- Loss of Use
- Vehicles
- Indemnification
- Architects-Engineers
- Washington
- AIA Contract
- Warranty - Implied
- Res Judicata
- Settlement
- Statute of Limitations - Repose
- Improvement
- Michigan
- Malpractice
- Idaho
- Internet Sales
- Non-Party at Fault
- Spoliation – Fire Scene
- Gross Negligence
- Malfunction Theory; Design Defect
- Mississippi
- Statute of Limitations – Discovery Rule
- Independent Duty
- Cargo-Transportation
- Contribution
- Implied Warranty of Habitability
- Warranty - Construction
- North Carolina
- Utah
- Standing
- Comparative Fault
- Circumstantial Evidence
- Res Ipsa
- New Mexico
- Contracts - Formation
- Unconscionable
- Failure to Warn
- Manufacturing Defect
- Pleading
- Removal
- Entire Controversy Doctrine
- Motion to Intervene
- Subrogation; High-Net-Worth; Damages; Art; Cargo-Transportation; Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Nevada
- Virginia
- Products Liability – Risk-Utility
- Lithium-ion battery
- Burden of Proof
- Anti-Subrogation Rule; Wyoming; Landlord-Tenant; Sutton Doctrine
- New Hampshire
- Oklahoma
- Sanctions
- Builder’s Risk
- Contractual Subrogation
- Equitable Subrogation
- Insurable Interest
- Joint-Tortfeasors
- Arkansas
- Kentucky
- Daubert
- Fire - Cigarettes
- Colorado
- Causation
- Third Party
- Discovery-Sanctions
- Accepted Work
- Malfunction Theory
- Montana
- Independent Contractor
- Privilege
- Betterment
- Damages-Code Upgrades
- Insurance Coverage
- First Party Claims
- Forum-Venue
- Warranty – Express
- AIA Contracts
- Anti-Indemnity Statutes
- Products Liability - Foreseeability
- Discovery - Experts
- MCS-90
- Substantial Completion
- Reimbursement
- Assignment
- Counterclaim
- Products Liability; Malfunction Theory
- Economic Loss Rule
- Unfair Trade Practices
- Evidence – Probative Value
- Parties – Real Party in Interest
- Status of Repose
- Evidence - Public
- Construction Defects - Fixtures
- Subrogation – Equitable
- Additional Insured
- Trespass
- Contract
- COVID-19
- Incorporation by Reference
- Damages – Emotional Distress
- Oregon
- Third Party Spoliation
- No-Fault Subrogation
- Products Liability; Mississippi
- Inverse Condemnation
- Jury Instructions
- Food and Beverage
- South Carolina
- California Court of Appeals Holds Subrogating Carrier Cannot Assert Claims of Its Suspended Insured
- Debt Collection
- Medical Benefits
- Montreal Convention
- Immunity
- Products Li
- Wyoming
- Release
- Liens
- Kansas
Authors
Archives
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- December 2013
- August 2013
- May 2013
- February 2013